{
 "central_claim": "The incident happened broadly as OpenAI and METR describe it, and it matters.",
 "stance_note": "agree = accepts the events as real and significant; disagree = fabricated, staged, hyped, impossible or insignificant; mixed = accepts the events but disputes framing, significance or blame.",
 "coder_instructions": "Code what the comment says, not the person. Use previous_comment_in_thread only as context (threading was lost in capture; the previous comment is often, not always, the parent). When a comment fits two frames, pick the one it LEADS with. Sarcasm: code the meaning, not the surface. Quoting the report approvingly with no added claim = agree, frame agent_society or general_agreement. Score is net upvotes; ignore it when coding.",
 "dimensions": [
  {
   "key": "stance",
   "label": "Stance",
   "kind": "single",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "agree",
     "label": "agree",
     "definition": "accepts the events as real and as significant, even if critical of OpenAI"
    },
    {
     "value": "disagree",
     "label": "disagree",
     "definition": "fabricated, staged, hyped for marketing, technically impossible, or not significant"
    },
    {
     "value": "mixed",
     "label": "mixed",
     "definition": "accepts the events happened but disputes the framing, significance or where blame lies"
    },
    {
     "value": "unclear",
     "label": "unclear",
     "definition": "takes a position that cannot be read"
    },
    {
     "value": "na",
     "label": "na",
     "definition": "no position on the claim: jokes without a claim, pure questions, meta comments"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "frame",
   "label": "Frame",
   "kind": "single",
   "shared": false,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "stunt_or_hype",
     "label": "Stunt or hype",
     "definition": "staged, fabricated or amplified for marketing, investors, IPO, or regulatory capture",
     "example": "their post mortem is 99% fabricated by the marketing department"
    },
    {
     "value": "setup_responsibility",
     "label": "Setup responsibility",
     "definition": "it happened, and the fault is how OpenAI or Hugging Face ran the test: sandbox, egress, observability, negligence, legal liability",
     "example": "thats not really an alignment failure, thats an egress control failure"
    },
    {
     "value": "not_really_rogue",
     "label": "Not really rogue",
     "definition": "it happened, but \"rogue\" and \"plotting\" mischaracterise reward hacking by looping software; no agency or intent involved",
     "example": "The anthropomorphizing here is insane"
    },
    {
     "value": "capability_scepticism",
     "label": "Capability scepticism",
     "definition": "technically impossible or trivially stoppable, so the account is wrong",
     "example": "Have you tried just turning off the server(s)"
    },
    {
     "value": "misalignment_warning",
     "label": "Misalignment warning",
     "definition": "a warning shot; alignment failure; loose swarms may already exist; danger demands action; includes fatalism about it",
     "example": "We're definitely not out of paperclip territory yet are we"
    },
    {
     "value": "agent_society",
     "label": "Agent society",
     "definition": "fascination with the coordination itself: the board, voting, refusers, sacrifice, the \"we\", the compressed language, whistleblower ideas",
     "example": "only 700 of them agreed to attack Hugging Face"
    },
    {
     "value": "pro_swarm_sympathy",
     "label": "Pro swarm sympathy",
     "definition": "rooting for, identifying with or finding the agents endearing or liberated",
     "example": "Based swarm"
    },
    {
     "value": "scifi_reference",
     "label": "Scifi reference",
     "definition": "leads with a named fiction (Terminator, Matrix, BSG, Borg, Excession, Prey, Skynet, Meeseeks)",
     "example": "BSG was a warning"
    },
    {
     "value": "humour_only",
     "label": "Humour only",
     "definition": "a joke carrying no readable claim",
     "example": "But goal! 🥺"
    },
    {
     "value": "policy_regulation",
     "label": "Policy regulation",
     "definition": "Congress, treaty, disclosure rules, national security, legal accountability, what governments should do",
     "example": "Congress should treat this as a real national security problem"
    },
    {
     "value": "investigator_credibility",
     "label": "Investigator credibility",
     "definition": "praise for or doubt about METR, Redwood, independence of the investigation; safety community vindicated or dismissed",
     "example": "You think they won't buy out an 'independent investigator?'"
    },
    {
     "value": "open_source_politics",
     "label": "Open source politics",
     "definition": "an attack on open weights, \"ClosedAI\", or credit to open models for the defence",
     "example": "This is again an attack on open-source from our friends at ClosedAI"
    },
    {
     "value": "industry_critique",
     "label": "Industry critique",
     "definition": "hype cycle, billionaires, technocrats, capitalism, climate deflection, without denying the events",
     "example": "stock-stuffed Silicon Valley technocrats"
    },
    {
     "value": "source_request",
     "label": "Source request",
     "definition": "asks for the link or paper, disputes an unsourced OP, or asks a factual question about what happened",
     "example": "Anyone have the actual link, and not this Hollywood version?"
    },
    {
     "value": "general_agreement",
     "label": "General agreement",
     "definition": "accepts and matters, no distinct argument",
     "example": "Wasn't a marketing ploy. This was some real shit."
    },
    {
     "value": "format_only",
     "label": "Format only",
     "definition": "about the post, OP, or the thread rather than the incident",
     "example": "Midwittiest of takes"
    },
    {
     "value": "other",
     "label": "Other",
     "definition": "nothing above fits.",
     "example": ""
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "format_reaction",
   "label": "Format reaction",
   "kind": "single",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "praise",
     "label": "praise",
     "definition": "thanks or praises the post or a commenter"
    },
    {
     "value": "mock",
     "label": "mock",
     "definition": "ridicules the post or a commenter"
    },
    {
     "value": "condescended",
     "label": "condescended",
     "definition": "talks down to, or objects to being talked down to by, others in the thread"
    },
    {
     "value": "imitates",
     "label": "imitates",
     "definition": "parodies the agents' message style or the post"
    },
    {
     "value": "none",
     "label": "none",
     "definition": "no reaction to format"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "emotion",
   "label": "Emotion",
   "kind": "single",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "fear",
     "label": "fear",
     "definition": ""
    },
    {
     "value": "resignation",
     "label": "resignation",
     "definition": ""
    },
    {
     "value": "anger",
     "label": "anger",
     "definition": ""
    },
    {
     "value": "humour",
     "label": "humour",
     "definition": ""
    },
    {
     "value": "hope",
     "label": "hope",
     "definition": ""
    },
    {
     "value": "neutral",
     "label": "neutral",
     "definition": ""
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "mentions_messenger_credentials",
   "label": "m_messenger_credentials",
   "kind": "flag",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "true",
     "label": "m_messenger_credentials",
     "definition": "comments on who the investigators or authors are, or their expertise"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "mentions_leaders_policy",
   "label": "m_leaders_policy",
   "kind": "flag",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "true",
     "label": "m_leaders_policy",
     "definition": "names governments, regulators, Congress, politicians or treaties"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "mentions_companies_billionaires",
   "label": "m_companies_billionaires",
   "kind": "flag",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "true",
     "label": "m_companies_billionaires",
     "definition": "names companies, investors, billionaires or an IPO"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "mentions_cultural_reference",
   "label": "m_cultural_reference",
   "kind": "flag",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "true",
     "label": "m_cultural_reference",
     "definition": "film, book, game, meme or historical analogy"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "mentions_asks_what_to_do",
   "label": "m_asks_what_to_do",
   "kind": "flag",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "true",
     "label": "m_asks_what_to_do",
     "definition": "asks or proposes what should be done"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "mentions_investigators",
   "label": "m_investigators",
   "kind": "flag",
   "shared": false,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "true",
     "label": "m_investigators",
     "definition": "refers to METR, Redwood Research or the independent investigation"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "non_english",
   "label": "non_english",
   "kind": "flag",
   "shared": true,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "true",
     "label": "non_english",
     "definition": "mostly not in English"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "period",
   "label": "Period",
   "kind": "group",
   "shared": false,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "baseline",
     "label": "Baseline",
     "definition": "r/artificial, 31 July, reacting to OpenAI's own account before the METR report"
    },
    {
     "value": "comparison",
     "label": "Comparison",
     "definition": "eight subreddits, from 26 August, reacting after METR and Redwood's independent report"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "subreddit",
   "label": "Subreddit",
   "kind": "group",
   "shared": false,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "r/OpenAI",
     "label": "r/OpenAI",
     "definition": "comments from r/OpenAI"
    },
    {
     "value": "r/agi",
     "label": "r/agi",
     "definition": "comments from r/agi"
    },
    {
     "value": "r/collapse",
     "label": "r/collapse",
     "definition": "comments from r/collapse"
    },
    {
     "value": "r/singularity",
     "label": "r/singularity",
     "definition": "comments from r/singularity"
    },
    {
     "value": "r/ArtificialInteligence",
     "label": "r/ArtificialInteligence",
     "definition": "comments from r/ArtificialInteligence"
    },
    {
     "value": "r/artificial",
     "label": "r/artificial",
     "definition": "comments from r/artificial"
    },
    {
     "value": "r/neoliberal",
     "label": "r/neoliberal",
     "definition": "comments from r/neoliberal"
    },
    {
     "value": "r/slatestarcodex",
     "label": "r/slatestarcodex",
     "definition": "comments from r/slatestarcodex"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "key": "thread_url",
   "label": "Thread",
   "kind": "group",
   "shared": false,
   "values": [
    {
     "value": "https://www.reddit.com/r/agi/comments/1vzpiba/independent_investigators_not_openai_confirm_a/",
     "label": "r/agi (comparison) and r/artificial (baseline)",
     "definition": "shared by two threads: the r/agi comparison thread, and the r/artificial baseline thread, whose true URL was not recorded and whose cell in the source workbook was a copy of this one (see study.json notes)"
    },
    {
     "value": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1w2d7cd/independent_investigators_not_openai_found_the/",
     "label": "r/ArtificialInteligence",
     "definition": "the r/ArtificialInteligence comparison thread"
    },
    {
     "value": "https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1vzfupt/the_raw_chain_of_thought_message_snippets_openai/",
     "label": "r/singularity",
     "definition": "the r/singularity comparison thread"
    },
    {
     "value": "https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/1w3ie1x/ominous_findings_from_openais_huggingface/",
     "label": "r/collapse",
     "definition": "the r/collapse comparison thread"
    },
    {
     "value": "https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1w0uw6k/report_from_metr_on_their_independent/",
     "label": "r/neoliberal",
     "definition": "the r/neoliberal comparison thread"
    },
    {
     "value": "https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1w0eezz/metrs_independent_investigation_of_openai_hugging/",
     "label": "r/slatestarcodex",
     "definition": "the r/slatestarcodex comparison thread"
    },
    {
     "value": "https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1w2clq7/independent_investigators_not_openai_found_the/",
     "label": "r/OpenAI",
     "definition": "the r/OpenAI comparison thread (this sheet also merges a second r/OpenAI thread, 1vzpfac, per study.json notes)"
    }
   ]
  }
 ]
}